In 1996, Congress, concerned that
"the historical integrity of many Revolutionary War sites and War of 1812 sites
is at risk," enacted legislation calling for a study of historic sites
associated with the two early-American wars.
The purpose of the study is to 1) identify Revolutionary War sites and
War of 1812 sites; 2) determine the relative significance of the sites; 3)
assess short- and long- term threats to the integrity of the sites;
4) provide alternatives for the preservation and interpretation of the sites;
and 5) research and propose land preservation techniques. The legislation defines "site" as "a site or structure situated in the United States that is thematically tied with the nationally significant events that occurred during the Revolutionary War… [and] the War of 1812."
The National Park Service (NPS) assembled an
interdisciplinary Study Team from American Battlefield Protection and the
Cultural Resources Geographic Information Systems program. Funds became available to begin the study in
FY99. The Study Team’s first task was
to identify sites associated with the two wars. The team has identified almost 1,700 sites. The public will have an opportunity to
comment on the site list and may provide information about additional
sites. After the public comment period,
the NPS will update the list and pass it on to the study Advisory Committee of
scholars for review. The committee will
sort the list first by level of historic significance and then by geographic
distribution, and provide recommendations for field survey to the NPS. The NPS will survey as many of the sites as
it can within budget and time constraints.
Field surveys will begin in the summer of 2000 and last approximately
one year. Sites in as many as 32 states
and the District of Columbia may be surveyed.
Field surveyors will document site condition and use, and present or
potential threats to the site. Once
field surveys are complete, the Study Team will evaluate the sites based on
condition and threat, complete a statistical analysis of the survey data, and
research preservation strategies. The
NPS and the Advisory Committee will then make recommendations for site
preservation and interpretation and submit a final study report for Departmental approval and subsequent
transmittal to the Congress by the Secretary.
The following methodology
explains the Study Team’s approach to defining the wars, identifying sites
associated with each war, and providing for public comment on the site lists.
Defining the Wars
The study legislation does not
define the terms "Revolutionary War" and "War of 1812". The NPS needed to define the wars in order
to limit the study to an examination of events that occurred during the two
discrete periods only.
For the purposes of the study,
the NPS defines the time period of the Revolutionary War by the dates April 19,
1775 to September 3, 1783 and the time period of the War of 1812 by the dates
June 18, 1812 to February 17, 1815. On
April 19, 1775, the Battles of Lexington and Concord signaled the first major
offensive military act by the British to suppress the colonists that resulted
in fighting and bloodshed. Scholars
generally agree that those events ignited the atmosphere of rebellion and
ushered in a military and political state of war. The end date given for the Revolutionary War, September 3, 1783,
is the date on which American and British diplomats signed the Treaty of Paris. The War of 1812 officially began on June 18,
1812, when Congress declared war against Great Britain. The War of 1812 officially ended on February
17, 1815, when the United States and Great Britain exchanged ratifications of
the Treaty of Ghent.
Known Universe of Sites
The Study Team’s next major
objective was to identify sites in the United States "thematically tied to the
nationally significant events" of the two wars, such as battlefields of
military campaigns or buildings where political decisions were made. Sites not directly associated with important
events of the two wars, such as
commemorative places and properties associated solely with significant persons
of the period, were not included in the study.
Initially, the NPS Study Team
determined that it needed to enumerate all known battles of both wars, not just
the most notable, in order to make the most informed decisions possible
regarding the relative historical significance of the sites. From the Battle List the Study Team could
establish relative geographical extent of the two wars. Looking at all counties in which battles
occurred, the Study Team was able to identify associated historic properties within
those counties by searching the National Register of Historic Places
files. (See the methodologies for
creating the Battle List and the Associated Historic Property List below.)
Both the Battle List and the
Associated Historic Property List denote historical events regardless of
recognized integrity issues at the contemporary sites of those events. Whether tangible resources remain at the
sites will be determined through field surveys. By visiting historically significant but compromised or destroyed
sites, the Study Team hopes to better understand the state of preservation for
Revolutionary War and War of 1812 resources as a whole. This context will help the Study Team and
the advisory committee develop preservation recommendations for identifiable
and extant sites, as well as interpretative recommendations for lost sites.
The two lists are starting points
to help guide states, tribes, scholars, and others who may contribute
additional information to the study based on their own research, site inventories,
and knowledge. These lists are not the final lists of sites to be
inspected in the field.
Site Database
To facilitate data management,
the Study Team developed a database in Microsoft Access 7.0 to house
information from the Battle List and the Associated Property List. Each list was created as a separate table
within the database. The Battle List
table includes information such as name, location, significant date(s),
associated campaign if known, and type of action. The Associated Historic Properties List table contains similar
information, but also notes historic theme, property type, source information,
and a brief statement of significance.
The information contained in the database should be sufficient for
reviewers to identify the action or property and its relationship to the
Revolutionary War or the War of 1812.
Public Comment Period
In
June 2000, the ABPP launched a new web site with an interactive component to
facilitate public participation in the Revolutionary War and War of 1812
Historic Preservation Study. The web
site includes the battle and associated historic property database and
information for field surveyors.
Through the web site, users will be able to help the NPS determine which
sites to survey and study in depth.
The interactive web site will
allow interested parties
to inspect the Battle List and Associated Historic Properties List, add
information directly to the study’s database, and comment on the significance
of the properties. Visitors will be
able to review those properties they are most familiar with by searching the
database alphabetically, by state, by county, by campaign, by war, and by
historical theme. Reviewers may make
comments, rank the relative significance of sites according to established criteria,
and add other important sites not included on the initial list. The Battle List and the Associated Historic
Property List will also be available in Microsoft Access 7.0 or hard copy for
those who do not have access to the Internet.
The online comment period will
begin once the web site is posted online and will last six weeks. Once the review period concludes, the NPS
Study Team will tally the results of the significance ranking and the comments
provided by reviewers. From these
results, the team will create a ranked list of significant associated historic
properties designed to guide the survey process. The study’s Advisory Committee will recommend priorities for
survey based on historical significance, geographic distribution, and budgetary
considerations.
Survey of Battle Sites and Associated Historic Properties
Upon receiving survey
recommendations from the Advisory Committee, the NPS will coordinate field
surveys with state historic preservation offices, tribal governments, and
national parks, and others. In order to
maintain consistent data for the entire study, every site on the survey list
will be visited and documented using survey methods developed by the NPS. The physical survey of each battle site and
associated historic property will help the National Park Service gauge
integrity, potential threats, and preservation options accurately.
Battle List
Battles, actions, and skirmishes listed are those traditionally
recognized as representative of the broader military contexts of each war. Limited staff time required that the initial
Battle List include only documented and verifiable battle actions; minor
incidents that require primary research to confirm were not included. These may be added during the public comment
period if additional information indicates the existence of such actions.
In February 1999, the National Park Service sent
requests to 31 State Historic Preservation Offices asking for additional
information about potential sites. The
NPS also posted its then-current list to the World Wide Web and requested
comments from the public about the list.
Fourteen SHPOs replied to the NPS and sent additional information on
battle sites and Associated Historic Properties. The web site generated 27 comments from the public. The NPS added and corrected battle site
information based on the comments of the SHPOs and the public. By May 2000, the NPS Study Team had
identified 32 states and the District of Columbia in which some event
associated with one of the wars took place.
Associated
Historic Property List
The Associated Historic
Properties List consists of historic places, other than battle sites, that have
a tangible connection to the Revolutionary War or the War of 1812. It includes properties dealing with
commerce, agriculture, social history, and government; military sites that were
not scenes of direct engagements (such as headquarters, encampments, supply
centers, etc); and other significant places associated with the two wars.
Using the March 2000 Battle List,
the staff defined a geographic extent of battles to help define the search
parameters for associated historic properties. The Study Team surmised that the
majority of associated resources would logically fall within approximately the
same geographic area as the major military campaigns due to general settlement
patterns, trade networks, and the locations of governmental installations. Many of the associated historic properties
within these areas became military objectives and targets, such as supply
depots, manufacturing sites, or other political and strategic locations, but
were not necessarily battle locations.
The March 2000 Battle List
indicated the need to search 281 counties and cities (see attached list). Since March, the NPS Study Team has
substantially revised the Battle List, adding actions in 31 new counties. Associated Historic Properties in these 31
new counties were not added to the database prior to the public comment
period. Sites located beyond the battle
and campaign counties will be identified through additional research and public
comment. During the public comment
period, reviewers may add to the NPS database significant properties that lie
outside the campaign areas or that were missed in the initial search.
Once the Study Team identified
the 281 counties and cities, it turned to the National Register of Historic
Places. The National Register is one of
the only nationwide inventories of significant cultural resources and is the
primary data source for any major cultural resource study.
The Study Team first queried the
National Register database (known as the National Register Information System
or NRIS) for all listings in counties where battles or campaigns were known to
have occurred. The Study Team then asked the NRIS to list properties found
in those counties by significant dates falling between 1775-1783 and
1812-1815. The NRIS produced a list of
more than 2,000 properties based on the query criteria. In some cases, historic
districts and other resources with extensive boundaries cross county
lines. The National Register references
properties by one county only. Some
such properties may therefore have fallen outside the search parameters.
Next, the Study Team consulted
the nominations themselves to determine whether the properties selected through
the NRIS query were associated with the two wars, a determination that can only
be verified by reviewing the narrative Statement of Significance. During this inspection, the Study Team
realized that the query results had omitted numerous properties associated with
the two wars. To compensate for the
data gaps, Study Team members pulled each nomination within the battle and
campaign counties, regardless of its date of significance, and examined the
narrative Statement of Significance to determine if the property was associated
with either war.
As the
National Register has evolved, the standards for documenting listed properties
have improved significantly.
Early nominations (1966 through early 1980s), which include many
well-known 18th-century and early-19th-century resources, do not always exhibit
the level of professional documentation that is presently required by the
National Register. In some cases, the narrative Statements of Significance of
the early nominations do not contain enough detail to associate the properties
with either war. Different degrees of
documentation affected the NPS Study Team’s ability to select sites accurately
for the Associated Historic Properties List.
Finally, the Study Team recognizes that the impetus for
preparing and submitting National Register nominations grows out of State,
local, even individual property owner priorities, and that there has never been
a concerted national effort to nominate all significant sites associated with
these two wars. As a result, the
National Register is an excellent starting point for identifying these
properties, but it is not a complete inventory. The Study Team expects that the public comment period, along with
the work of the Advisory Committee, will identify any additional properties
that should be added to the initial Associated Historic Property list.